Preview the structure of the ready-to-adapt materials included in the AI Clarity & Implementation Kit for Business Schools.
Full access includes downloadable files, visual label assets, and Kiwi, the AI Clarity Kit Guide.
The Kit gives business school leaders a practical implementation library for AI clarity across audiences.
Buyers do not need to use every document at once. The Kit is organized so different users can begin with the materials that match their role and immediate need.
Start with Module 1, then Module 5.
Start with 1.3, 5.3, and 5.4.
Start with Module 2, then 4.1 and 4.2.
Start with Module 6.
This preview shows what is included. Full file access is available after purchase.
Start with this overview before using the module files. It explains what is included, how the Kit is organized, and how different users can decide where to begin.
A quick orientation guide to the Kit structure, module purposes, suggested starting points, role-based use paths, and recommended first steps for implementation.
Kiwi helps licensed Kit users find the right files, choose a starting path, adapt language for their school context, draft communications, and understand how the Kit modules connect.
Use these documents to define a focused school-level AI clarity baseline, decide what should be common versus flexible, and prepare clear leadership communications for faculty and students.
A short internal memo leaders can adapt to align the dean’s team around a focused AI clarity approach before broader rollout.
A leadership working template for defining a small set of common AI expectations without over-standardizing course-level practice.
A decision guide for determining which AI expectations should be school-wide and which should remain instructor-, course-, or discipline-specific.
Ready-to-adapt faculty messages that introduce the school-level AI clarity approach while reinforcing faculty discretion and reducing defensiveness.
A short student-facing message leaders can adapt to explain AI expectations, course-level variation, disclosure, and where students should look for guidance.
Use these materials to help faculty translate school-level AI expectations into clear syllabus language, disclosure guidance, category examples, and course-level instructions students can actually interpret.
A detailed guide for choosing and adapting course-level AI-use syllabus language, including restricted, allowed, limited, assignment-specific, and expected/required options.
Fast copy/paste syllabus statements for common AI-use stances when faculty need a clear starting point quickly.
Practical disclosure models and student examples that help faculty specify when and how students should report AI use.
Concrete category language and examples that make AI Allowed, AI Limited, AI Restricted, and AI Expected/Required easier for students to understand.
Reassuring, practical answers to common faculty questions about AI discretion, disclosure, assignment redesign, detection, course variation, and student clarity.
A put-it-all-together template faculty can adapt for syllabi, LMS pages, course overviews, or assignment instructions.
Use these materials to help students understand AI expectations across courses, interpret course-level variation, disclose AI use when required, and use AI responsibly when it is allowed, limited, assignment-specific, or expected/required.
Broad student-facing language schools can adapt for AI guidance pages, LMS resources, orientation materials, handbooks, or student support pages.
Copy/adapt examples that show students how to disclose AI use clearly when a course or assignment requires it.
Plain-language answers to common student questions about AI rules, disclosure, course differences, labels, and what to do when expectations are unclear.
Student-facing language that explains why AI expectations may differ across courses and assignments when rules are tied to learning goals.
A practical student guide for using AI responsibly while maintaining accuracy, judgment, disclosure, evidence, and accountability.
Use these materials to help faculty translate AI guidance into actual assignment instructions, assessment design, and teaching practice. This module is designed for practical course-level use: prompts, disclosure language, redesign moves, and discipline-specific assignment examples.
Quick copy/paste language faculty can place directly into assignment prompts or LMS assignment pages to clarify AI use for a specific task.
Faculty-facing language for asking students to disclose, explain, or reflect on AI use in a specific assignment.
A fast lookup guide for common business-school assignments such as case analyses, memos, presentations, group projects, data assignments, discussion posts, exams, and capstones.
A practical redesign menu for making assignments more AI-aware without rebuilding the course, including process notes, evidence requirements, checkpoints, oral explanations, verification, and tradeoff reasoning.
Discipline-specific examples showing how AI-aware assignment design can work across major business-school teaching areas.
AI-aware marketing assignment example focused on customer insight, segmentation, positioning, campaign logic, evidence, and strategic judgment.
A management case decision and no-script defense model that helps students diagnose a management problem, apply course concepts, use case evidence, explain tradeoffs, and defend a recommendation.
An opportunity evaluation and founder judgment defense model that helps students separate AI-generated ideas from customer evidence, assumptions, uncertainty, and go / no-go / revise decisions.
A regression analysis and video defense model that protects analytical learning by requiring analysis files, highlighted output, plain-language interpretation, and a bounded business recommendation.
A financial statement analysis model with workpaper trail and oral defense, designed to preserve calculation work, source tracing, accounting evidence, interpretation, and professional judgment.
A valuation recommendation and assumption defense model that requires calculation files, assumption justification, sensitivity analysis, risk interpretation, and finance judgment.
A strategic option evaluation and assumption defense model that helps students compare options, apply strategy frameworks, use evidence, explain tradeoffs, and defend a bounded recommendation.
A supplier selection scorecard and disruption risk defense model that requires weighted criteria, operational tradeoffs, supplier data, disruption reasoning, and decision defense.
An executive decision brief and AI challenge round model that treats AI as a structured thinking partner while preserving executive judgment, context sensitivity, implementation constraints, and accountability.
A service recovery and guest experience defense model that helps students evaluate AI-generated service responses using empathy, brand fit, operational feasibility, accountability, and service-management judgment.
A policy brief / market analysis model that requires economic reasoning, source or data verification, graph/model interpretation, assumptions, limitations, and evidence-based conclusions.
Use these tools to move from AI clarity materials to practical rollout. This module helps leaders communicate expectations, support faculty, run focused discussions, and check whether guidance is working during the first month of the term.
A practical checklist for preparing faculty-facing materials, student-facing clarity, syllabus updates, assignment guidance, and first-week communication before a new term begins.
A leadership-to-faculty memo template for communicating the rollout, explaining minimum actions, preserving faculty discretion, and directing faculty to the shared materials.
A facilitation guide for department heads, program directors, or faculty leads who need to help faculty discuss AI expectations without turning the meeting into a broad policy debate.
A ready-to-adapt agenda for a school-wide or program-wide faculty meeting focused on AI clarity, syllabus updates, assignment guidance, student communication, and next steps.
A follow-up checklist for identifying recurring faculty and student questions, checking assignment-level clarity, addressing red flags, and making targeted improvements after rollout.
Use these materials to explore how AI learning could appear in the business curriculum through developmental pathways, standalone course concepts, embedded modules, and phased curriculum decisions. This module is a planning library, not a required curriculum model.
A leadership-facing curriculum map showing how AI learning could develop from first-year literacy to advanced business judgment, functional application, and responsible implementation.
A menu of standalone AI course models for undergraduate, MBA, executive education, or specialized programs, including course positioning, signature assignments, and leadership use cases.
A ready-to-adapt syllabus outline for a practical, non-technical AI in Business course focused on tools, judgment, verification, responsible use, and business application.
Small, ready-to-adapt AI learning modules faculty can insert into existing business courses without creating a new course.
A leadership decision guide for choosing between a standalone AI course, distributed integration across existing courses, or a phased hybrid model.
Use these optional visual assets to make AI expectations easier to see in syllabi, LMS pages, assignment prompts, course modules, slides, and faculty support materials. Labels should support, not replace, written instructions about what students may and may not do.
Start here. This PDF explains how to use the AI-use labels in syllabi, LMS pages, assignment prompts, and faculty-facing materials.
One image showing the full label set together: AI Allowed, AI Limited, AI Restricted, AI Expected, AI Required, and Assignment-Specific.
Full-size visual labels for AI Allowed, AI Limited, AI Restricted, AI Expected, AI Required, and Assignment-Specific use.
Smaller badge versions for syllabi, LMS modules, assignment headers, slide decks, or quick visual references.
These materials are designed as ready-to-adapt implementation resources. They should be reviewed and revised to fit each school’s policies, governance structure, academic integrity rules, student conduct language, accessibility standards, and institutional terminology.
The Kit does not provide legal advice or replace institutional policy review. It is a practical drafting and implementation library for improving clarity, consistency, and usability.
The full Kit includes all downloadable materials, visual label assets, and Kiwi, the companion assistant for navigating and adapting the Kit.
Get the Kit