A 10-business-day leadership briefing that shows where AI guidance is coherent, where mixed signals may be emerging, and what should be standardized before the next term.
Led by a business professor who understands faculty autonomy, student expectations, academic integrity, and the realities of school-level decision-making.
A focused review of current AI guidance, selected course materials, and student-facing expectations — with clear priorities for what leadership should standardize, clarify, or communicate before the next term.
See the BriefingBusiness schools are moving quickly on AI, but course-level guidance often develops unevenly. One course may encourage AI use, another may restrict it, and students may not understand what applies where.
A simple, low-burden process that delivers a clear leadership view in 10 business days.
You provide one 30-minute leadership call and any current AI guidance, academic integrity language, selected syllabi, assignment guidance, or student-facing materials that are easy to share.
Aga Academy reviews the materials for coherence, mixed signals, student confusion points, and policy-to-practice gaps.
Within 10 business days, leadership receives a concise briefing with priority issues, recommended clarifications, and ready-to-adapt language.
For schools that want implementation support after the Briefing, the Kit provides ready-to-adapt language, guidance, examples, and rollout tools.
Even when schools are doing meaningful work around AI, leadership may still be facing problems like:
Ready-to-adapt leadership language, faculty guidance, student-facing materials, assignment examples, and rollout tools for schools that want to move from diagnosis to implementation without starting from a blank page.
Aga Academy helps business schools turn AI uncertainty into clearer leadership decisions, shared language, and practical implementation materials.
Focused on business education, not generic higher-ed consulting.
Designed to avoid creating one more committee process.
Built around decision-ready outputs and next-step priorities.
Accounts for faculty autonomy, student expectations, and course-level variation.
No. The Briefing is not designed to evaluate individual faculty members or judge specific courses. It looks for school-level patterns: where guidance is clear, where expectations may conflict, and where students or faculty may need clearer language.
Typically, one 30-minute leadership call, any existing AI guidance or academic integrity language that is easy to share, and a sample of course materials such as syllabi, assignment instructions, or student-facing guidance. A short faculty pulse survey can be included if useful.
The standard timeline is 10 business days from receipt of the core materials.
Leadership receives an AI Semester Readiness Score, a 5-Dimension Leadership Scorecard, a Mixed Signals Report, a Student Confusion Map, a Leadership Decision Memo, and a Launch Language Pack with draft language leadership can adapt.
No. The process is designed to be low-burden. Faculty interviews are not required. If helpful, a short faculty pulse survey can be included.
Schools that want additional support can add the AI Clarity & Implementation Kit, which includes ready-to-adapt leadership language, faculty-facing guidance, student-facing materials, assignment examples, and rollout tools.
Request the 1-page overview or get in touch to discuss whether the Semester Readiness Briefing would be useful for your school.